Re: [Lightning] jit_pusharg_p: small bug

[Ludovic Courtès]

Paolo Bonzini <address@hidden> writes:

>>> Therefore I suggest rewriting the above macro as:
>>>
>>>  #define jit_pusharg_p(rs)        jit_pusharg_ul((unsigned long)rs)
>>
>> Right, thanks.  Indeed that's the main purpose of having a _p
>> variant, since lightning assumes (just like everybody except
>> Microsoft) that sizeof (long) == sizeof (void *).
>
> No, wait I was not thinking.  jit_pusharg_p takes a *register number".  

You mean there's a bug in my piece of code?  Hmm, sorry about that.  ;-)

Thanks,
Ludovic.