[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libunwind] sos_alloc()
From: |
Todd L Miller |
Subject: |
Re: [libunwind] sos_alloc() |
Date: |
Fri, 26 Mar 2004 15:45:30 -0600 (CST) |
Those two fixes didn't seem to help, but I've been hacking on the
stock 0.96 release of libunwind, so I may be missing other fixes. Is
there a (reasonable) way of getting the current libunwind sources without
using BK? (Maybe convert the BK changesets from the 0.96 release to a
patch?)
I've been working around the problem by doubling the sos_alloc
array size (up to 64K now). I inserted an fprintf(stderr...) where
mempool.c and tables-ia64.c call sos_alloc() [they're the only two], and
only got this for tables-ia64. I got 293 hits there, each of 112 bytes
which would 32816, just larger than the 32768 that I'd had before doubling
the pool again. Is there a reason for tables-ia64
(_Uia64_get_kernel_table(), specifically) to use sos_alloc() instead of,
e.g., malloc()?
- Todd Miller
- [libunwind] sos_alloc(), Todd L Miller, 2004/03/25
- Re: [libunwind] sos_alloc(), David Mosberger, 2004/03/25
- Re: [libunwind] sos_alloc(),
Todd L Miller <=
- Re: [libunwind] sos_alloc(), David Mosberger, 2004/03/26
- Re: [libunwind] sos_alloc(), Todd L Miller, 2004/03/26
- Re: [libunwind] sos_alloc(), David Mosberger, 2004/03/26
- Re: [libunwind] sos_alloc(), Todd L Miller, 2004/03/26
- Re: [libunwind] sos_alloc(), David Mosberger, 2004/03/26