[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool shouldn't switch to creating static library if it can't crea
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: libtool shouldn't switch to creating static library if it can't create the shared one under Windows |
Date: |
Thu, 23 Jun 2011 09:24:35 -0500 (CDT) |
User-agent: |
Alpine 2.01 (GSO 1266 2009-07-14) |
On Thu, 23 Jun 2011, Vadim Zeitlin wrote:
I.e. it created a shared library with undefined symbols without any
problems because it never actually passed -no-undefined to g++/ld.
In actual practice, it seems difficult or impossible to build programs
under systems like Linux with -no-undefined. I tried this before, but
glibc got in the way since it depends on some symbols which are
never/rarely defined. Under Linux, programs run just fine with
undefined symbols as long as they are never accessed.
I have no idea whether -no-undefined is supposed to work like this but in
any case it seems to me that it's perfectly useless right now. It's not
Not quite useless, but not pedantically useful either.
Bob
--
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden, http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen/
GraphicsMagick Maintainer, http://www.GraphicsMagick.org/
- Re: libtool shouldn't switch to creating static library if it can't create the shared one under Windows, (continued)
- Re[4]: libtool shouldn't switch to creating static library if it can't create the shared one under Windows, Vadim Zeitlin, 2011/06/17
- Re: libtool shouldn't switch to creating static library if it can't create the shared one under Windows, Charles Wilson, 2011/06/18
- Re: libtool shouldn't switch to creating static library if it can't create the shared one under Windows, Vadim Zeitlin, 2011/06/21
- Re: libtool shouldn't switch to creating static library if it can't create the shared one under Windows, Charles Wilson, 2011/06/21
- Re: libtool shouldn't switch to creating static library if it can't create the shared one under Windows, Vadim Zeitlin, 2011/06/23
- Re: libtool shouldn't switch to creating static library if it can't create the shared one under Windows, Peter Rosin, 2011/06/23
- Re[2]: libtool shouldn't switch to creating static library if it can't create the shared one under Windows, Vadim Zeitlin, 2011/06/23
- Re: libtool shouldn't switch to creating static library if it can't create the shared one under Windows, Peter Rosin, 2011/06/23
- Re: libtool shouldn't switch to creating static library if it can't create the shared one under Windows,
Bob Friesenhahn <=
- Re[2]: libtool shouldn't switch to creating static library if it can't create the shared one under Windows, Vadim Zeitlin, 2011/06/23
- Re: libtool shouldn't switch to creating static library if it can't create the shared one under Windows, Charles Wilson, 2011/06/23
- Re: libtool shouldn't switch to creating static library if it can't create the shared one under Windows, Vadim Zeitlin, 2011/06/25
- Re: libtool shouldn't switch to creating static library if it can't create the shared one under Windows, Peter Rosin, 2011/06/17