[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed |
Date: |
Thu, 14 Feb 2008 07:57:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17 (2008-01-17) |
* Duft Markus wrote on Mon, Feb 11, 2008 at 09:38:49AM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues <mailto:address@hidden> wrote:
> > You have several options to avoid this failure:
> >
> > - find out why timestamps are not in the right order after
> > libtoolize --ltdl=sub/ltdl
> >
> > (inside sub/ltdl, configure.ac should come before aclocal.m4 should
> > come before configure and Makefile.in). This is a bug. It seems
> > that has to do with your system's symlink semantics.
[...]
> Ok Thanks. I will have a look at this. For Symlinks: i use cp -p instead
> of ln -s. can this cause the misbehaviour?
Surely possible, for example if 'cp -p' truncates time stamps, and the
files in question had sub-cp-resolution differences in the stamps before
copying. But since 44 45 and 46 all failed, I doubt that that's the
only reason.
Cheers,
Ralf
- Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed, Duft Markus, 2008/02/11
- RE: Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed, Duft Markus, 2008/02/11
- RE: Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed, Duft Markus, 2008/02/11
- RE: Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed, Duft Markus, 2008/02/11
- RE: Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed, Duft Markus, 2008/02/11
- RE: Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed, Duft Markus, 2008/02/11
- Re: Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- RE: Subject: [libtool 2.1c] testsuite: 44 45 46 failed, Duft Markus, 2008/02/11