[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Libtool 2.1b test results
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Libtool 2.1b test results |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 06:21:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 09:22:19AM CET:
> * Mike Frysinger wrote on Sat, Feb 09, 2008 at 08:37:31AM CET:
>
> > # Whether or not to optimize for fast installation.
> > fast_install=needless
>
> This looks very weird to me, and I cannot explain it at all. Did you use
> any patches on top of 2.1b? You didn't `./configure --disable-shared'
> either. And shlibpath_overrides_runpath is no, too.
Can you try to find out why this happens for you? Either put 'set -x'
as second line in the configure script, or embrace the code regions that
set enable_fast_install with 'set -x'/'set +x', and post the (gziped,
please) output.
Thanks,
Ralf
- Re: GNU Libtool 2.1b released (alpha release), (continued)
- Re: GNU Libtool 2.1b released (alpha release), Jason Curl, 2008/02/06
- Re: GNU Libtool 2.1b released (alpha release), Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/02/06
- Re: GNU Libtool 2.1b released (alpha release), Simon Josefsson, 2008/02/06
- Re: GNU Libtool 2.1b released (alpha release), Pavel Roskin, 2008/02/07
- Libtool 2.1b test results, Mike Frysinger, 2008/02/08
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/09
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Mike Frysinger, 2008/02/09
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/09
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Mike Frysinger, 2008/02/12
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/13
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/02/13
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/13
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/02/19
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Peter O'Gorman, 2008/02/20
- Re: Libtool 2.1b test results, Mike Frysinger, 2008/02/13