[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: handling of missing AR
From: |
Olly Betts |
Subject: |
Re: handling of missing AR |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Mar 2006 20:41:35 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
slrn/0.9.8.1 (Linux) |
On 2006-03-29, Brian Gough <address@hidden> wrote:
> checking for ar... false
> [...]
> false cru .libs/libutils.a .libs/placeholder.o
> make[2]: *** [libutils.la] Error 1
If AR defaulted to "$(MISSING) ar" if no ar was found (instead of false), then
no error is given if ar is not found but never used, but the end user gets a
more helpful error if it's not found and is used:
WARNING: `ar' is needed, and is missing on your system.
You might have modified some files without having the
proper tools for further handling them. Check the `README' file,
it often tells you about the needed prerequisites for installing
this package. You may also peek at any GNU archive site, in case
some other package would contain this missing `ar' program.
The message could be better (the second sentence is wrong), but it's better
than that quoted above. It could easily be improved too - just add a case for
ar to the missing script with a more specific error.
Cheers,
Olly
- handling of missing AR, Brian Gough, 2006/03/29
- Re: handling of missing AR, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/03/29
- Re: handling of missing AR, Tim Mooney, 2006/03/29
- Re: handling of missing AR, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/03/29
- Re: handling of missing AR, Tim Mooney, 2006/03/29
- Re: handling of missing AR, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/03/30
- Re: handling of missing AR, Tim Mooney, 2006/03/30
- Re: handling of missing AR, David Lee, 2006/03/30
- Re: handling of missing AR, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/03/30
Re: handling of missing AR, Brian Gough, 2006/03/30
Re: handling of missing AR,
Olly Betts <=