[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Speeding up libtool
From: |
Tor Lillqvist |
Subject: |
Re: Speeding up libtool |
Date: |
Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:32:41 +0200 |
Ralf Wildenhues writes:
> Linking is a problem, though: shell wrappers break,
I have never liked (or understood...) libtool's shell wrappers or its
relinking on Win32. I always use --disable-static, I always run a
"make install", and make sure the bin directory of the installation
location is in my PATH, before any "make check". And I always comment
out the "need_relink=yes" in any ltmain.sh that I come across ;-) This
means shell wrappers won't be produced. Or am I completely confused?
> How much is the actual speedup in numbers?
Very significant. I don't have my old machine (450 MHz PIII running
Win2k) around any longer, but libtool-cache made it feel like a
totally new machine. A rough guess would five times faster builds of
stuff like GLib or GTK.
--tml
- Speeding up libtool, Robert Ögren, 2005/03/14
- Re: Speeding up libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/03/15
- Re: Speeding up libtool,
Tor Lillqvist <=
- Re: Speeding up libtool, Robert Ögren, 2005/03/15
- Re: Speeding up libtool, Max Bowsher, 2005/03/15
- Re: Speeding up libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/03/16
- Re: Speeding up libtool, Robert Ögren, 2005/03/24
- Re: Speeding up libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2005/03/25
- Re: Speeding up libtool, Robert Ögren, 2005/03/25
- Re: Speeding up libtool, Robert Ögren, 2005/03/25
- Testsuite failures on Cygwin with ECHO=printf (was: Re: Speeding up libtool), Robert Ögren, 2005/03/26
Re: Speeding up libtool, Robert Ögren, 2005/03/25