|
From: | Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: | Re: partial linking |
Date: | Thu, 13 Jan 2005 12:03:35 -0600 (CST) |
On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
[ reply to two bug reports ] Hi Andreas and ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ, I hope that is the right way to address you (this is the first time I use cut'n'paste with UTF-8 proper, plus I can barely decipher cyrillic). * ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ ÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿÿ wrote on Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 01:48:06PM CET:Am I right, that there is no way to pass additional linker flags when doing partial linking?Yes, as of now. Consider it a bug.
Is partial linking a documented libtool feature? If not, how can failure to support partial linking be considered a bug?
Unless libtool can portably support a feature, or there at least can be a fallback to producing software that runs, then it should not be supported as a libtool feature.
Bob ====================================== Bob Friesenhahn address@hidden http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |