[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool |
Date: |
Sat, 20 Nov 2004 18:46:29 -0600 (CST) |
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
It seems that none of the libtool related macro definitions are being
expanded in configure even though aclocal and autoconf do not produce any
warnings. I expect that this is why Automake does not detect libtool.
What I have now learned the hard way is that aclocal ignores the
AC_CONFIG_MACRO_DIR([m4]) definition in configure.ac. As a result it
does not look for extra m4 files in the m4 subdirectory. In order to
bootstrap and obtain a working configure script I had to execute:
aclocal -I m4 && autoheader && autoconf && automake
It seems to me that this is a bug in aclocal.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen
- Convincing Automake to support libtool, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/20
- Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/20
- Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool,
Bob Friesenhahn <=
- Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2004/11/21
- Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/22
- Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/22
- Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/22
- Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool, Peter O'Gorman, 2004/11/22
- Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/11/22
- Re: Convincing Automake to support libtool, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/22