[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Version numbering
From: |
Scott James Remnant |
Subject: |
Re: Version numbering |
Date: |
Tue, 30 Sep 2003 22:16:44 +0100 |
On Tue, 2003-09-30 at 17:58, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:
> After the next cron web update, please read:
>
> http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool/contribute.html
>
> and give me your feedback...
>
Makes sense to me, seems to cover everything well enough to avoid any
confusion about what kind of release things are or not.
Also happens that dpkg agrees with your order (whereas it thinks 1.7 is
older than 1.7a).
I'm assuming that x.<odd number> means it's an alpha and x.<even number>
means a stable release?
Scott
--
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen? Are you going round the twist?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
- Re: Version numbering, (continued)
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V . Vaughan, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Daniel Reed, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Paul Jarc, 2003/09/29
- Re: Version numbering, Alexandre Duret-Lutz, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Bernd Jendrissek, 2003/09/30
- RE: Version numbering, Howard Chu, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Scott James Remnant, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Dalibor Topic, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering,
Scott James Remnant <=
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Gary V. Vaughan, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Scott James Remnant, 2003/09/30
- Re: Version numbering, Earnie Boyd, 2003/09/30
Re: Version numbering, Peter O'Gorman, 2003/09/29