libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH 1/r47] maint: help2man targets should rely on the binaries th


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/r47] maint: help2man targets should rely on the binaries they call.
Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 19:35:44 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04)

Hello Gary,

* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 07:05:48PM CEST:
> The start of my post-release patch queue... okay to push?
> 
> * Makefile.am (doc/libtool.1, doc/libtoolize.1): Don't rely on
> the intermediate files, since they might have changed without
> giving make the opportunity to update the actual binaries that
> help2man calls in time.

No, because 'libtool' is created in the build tree, and the manpages are
distributed.  Distributed files may not depend on undistributed files,
as that breaks building from a read-only source tree.  Moreover,
help2man is something the user is expected to not have to install prior
to building Libtool.

Cheers,
Ralf

> --- a/Makefile.am
> +++ b/Makefile.am
> @@ -326,9 +326,9 @@ MAINTAINERCLEANFILES      += $(dist_man1_MANS)
>  update_mans = \
>    PATH=.$(PATH_SEPARATOR)$$PATH; export PATH; \
>    $(HELP2MAN) --output=$@
> -$(srcdir)/doc/libtool.1: $(srcdir)/$(auxdir)/ltmain.sh
> +$(srcdir)/doc/libtool.1: libtool
>       $(update_mans) --help-option=--help-all libtool
> -$(srcdir)/doc/libtoolize.1: $(srcdir)/libtoolize.in
> +$(srcdir)/doc/libtoolize.1: libtoolize
>       $(update_mans) libtoolize



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]