[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: spaces
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: spaces |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:13:00 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
* Charles Wilson wrote on Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 07:29:52PM CET:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > For many years I have had my editor configured to always use
> > spaces. This ensures WYSIWYG for everyone involved.
>
> Agree 100%. I try to manually match whatever sp/tab convention is in
> place -- using vi if I have to -- but much prefer all spaces.
OK so it seems there are more voices for spaces.
Can we agree to make the switch only after 2.2.8 though,
I would like to avoid unnecessary churn ATM.
Thanks,
Ralf
- Provide a means to activate dynamically the debug traces, Akim Demaille, 2009/01/09
- Re: Provide a means to activate dynamically the debug traces, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/01/09
- Re: Provide a means to activate dynamically the debug traces, Akim Demaille, 2009/01/09
- Re: spaces (was: Provide a means to activate dynamically the debug traces), Akim Demaille, 2009/01/19
- Re: spaces (was: Provide a means to activate dynamically the debug traces), Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/01/19
- Re: spaces, Charles Wilson, 2009/01/20
- Re: spaces,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: spaces, Charles Wilson, 2009/01/21
- Re: spaces, Peter Rosin, 2009/01/22
- Re: spaces, Tim Rice, 2009/01/22
- Re: spaces, Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/01/22
- Re: spaces, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/01/19
- Re: spaces, Akim Demaille, 2009/01/22