[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [patch/rfc] setting version type based on vendor
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: [patch/rfc] setting version type based on vendor |
Date: |
Tue, 19 Feb 2008 01:40:14 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
Hello Mike,
Please post patches to the libtool-patches list in the future, thanks.
* Mike Frysinger wrote on Sat, Feb 16, 2008 at 09:48:52AM CET:
> i dont know if there's a policy on this, but we've been treating the shared
> libraries in the Gentoo/FreeBSD port like Linux shared libraries. we control
> this based upon the vendor field in the toolchain tuple.
I have no problem with this, other than: the fact that it may create an
incompatible switch-over point for gentoo users, and the unwary may be
expecting for her libraries, built on gentoo, could be usable on other
(gasp!) FreeBSD (-like) systems, and also that GNU/FreeBSD distributions
other than gentoo (if there are any) should not be discriminated
against. At least with GNU/Linux, the vendor field is completely useless
-- what about spin-offs of Gentoo for example, what do they use?
What do the others think?
Cheers,
Ralf
> 2008-02-16 Diego Pettenò <address@hidden>
>
> * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4: Treat Gentoo/FreeBSD shareds libs as Linux.
>
- Re: [patch/rfc] setting version type based on vendor,
Ralf Wildenhues <=