Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch

[Gary V. Vaughan]

On 17 Jan 2008, at 12:47, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > However, I
> > am fairly confident that old libtool documentation recommended the
> > opposite order, and opposite order was likely required at that time.
>
> I can't find any mention toward the relative order of AC_PROG_LIBTOOL
> and AC_LIB_LTDL in branch-1-5's manual at all.  And AC_WITH_LTDL was  
> not
> mentioned at all.


AC_WITH_LTDL was an experiment that never really worked out.  I think we
did require pathological ordering at some point too, but as far as I'm
aware the interface never settled down enough to make it into the docs.

Cheers,
        Gary
--
Gary V. Vaughan (address@hidden)

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part