[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 20:24:37 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 08:29:05PM CET:
> * Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 05:23:24AM CET:
> > On 8 Jan 2008, at 04:40, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> >> With this patch, I see in the log of
> >> make distcheck
> >>
> >> that the libltdl subdirectory is being configured. This is wrong, as
> >> libltdl in the Libtool package should be in nonrecursive mode rather
> >> than in subproject mode. This causes distcheck to fail. Can you fix
> >> this?
> >
> > I noticed this yesterday when I started the alpha release process too.
> > Yes, I'll figure this out before I go any further.
>
> It is because _LTDL_SETUP calls _LTDL_MODE_DISPATCH which calls
> AC_CONFIG_SUBDIRS. That's wrong, no? Is that because implicitly
> subproject-libltdl mode is assumed for the Libtool package?
OK to apply this fix (feeling a bit hackish, but does exactly what's
needed)?
Cheers,
Ralf
2008-01-14 Ralf Wildenhues <address@hidden>
* configure.ac: Set libltdl nonrecursive option, to avoid
configuring libltdl inside the Libtool package.
Index: configure.ac
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/configure.ac,v
retrieving revision 1.79
diff -u -r1.79 configure.ac
--- configure.ac 6 Jan 2008 16:33:30 -0000 1.79
+++ configure.ac 14 Jan 2008 19:24:05 -0000
@@ -181,6 +181,7 @@
## Libtool initialisation. ##
## ----------------------- ##
LT_INIT([dlopen win32-dll])
+_LT_SET_OPTION([LTDL_INIT], [nonrecursive])
_LTDL_SETUP
# Enable all the language support we can
- FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/01/06
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/07
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/01/07
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/08
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/16
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/01/16
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/17
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/01/17
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/17
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/08
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/01/14
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/15
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/01/15
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/15
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/01/15
- Message not available
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/16
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/01/17
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/17
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/12
- Re: FYI: 333-gary-refactor-LTDL_INIT.patch, Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/01/16