Re: mdemo ltdl failure

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hi Charles, Bruno,

* Charles Wilson wrote on Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 07:34:56AM CEST:
>
> Attached.  Re-ran *all* of the tests described here:
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2007-04/msg00073.html
> with identical results.

Thank you for patching and testing, and thanks to Bruno for the fine
review.

> I did not bump the argz.m4 serial again (I'm not sure what the rules are: 
> bump on EVERY change, or only on "big" changes?).  So, Ralf, please do that 
> manually if it is necessary.

It can't hurt, so I did that, and applied (libtool and gnulib).

> +          if test "$lt_os_major" -gt 1 \
> +             || { test "$lt_os_major" -eq 1 \
> +               && { test "$lt_os_minor" -gt 5 \
> +                 || { test "$lt_os_minor" -eq 5 \
> +                   && test "$lt_os_micro" -gt 24; }; }; }; then

Bruno asked for this GCS compliant formatting.  I have some (very minor)
issue with it: it looks uglier in shell, due to the necessary
backslashes.  Also, the GCS specify this for C code only, to be strict.
But I'm not all that strong about it, so I left it in your patch.

Cheers,
Ralf