[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: patch - add GNU/kFreeBSD support into shlibpath.m4
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: patch - add GNU/kFreeBSD support into shlibpath.m4 |
Date: |
Wed, 24 May 2006 09:53:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
Hello Tom, Petr,
* Tom Tromey wrote on Wed, May 24, 2006 at 02:37:35AM CEST:
> >>>>> "Petr" == Petr Salinger <address@hidden> writes:
>
> Petr> would be possible to include GNU/kFreeBSD support into shlibpath.m4.
> Petr> This change together with slightly modified boehm-gc gives reasonable
> Petr> results, see http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/java/2006-05/msg00093.html.
>
> We try to avoid local modifications to files like this.
> It came from libtool, as I recall. Could you see if the problem is
> fixed upstream? If so, we could import and "upstream-looking" patch.
> If not, the patch should probably go there first.
I think you're looking for this thread:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2006-03/msg00005.html
Somebody needs to convince the authors of the patches (Cc:ed) to assign
or disclaim copyright, or rewrite the patches, or convince me (or
another Libtool maintainer, FWIW) that the changes are trivial enough
not to warrant a copyright assignment.
(And no, changing
| - dynamic_linker='GNU/Linux ld.so'
| + dynamic_linker='GNU ld.so'
for GNU/Linux is not ok for Libtool, as suggested in Petr's patch.)
Cheers,
Ralf
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: patch - add GNU/kFreeBSD support into shlibpath.m4,
Ralf Wildenhues <=