libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: doc: foo.lo really is not the PIC object


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: doc: foo.lo really is not the PIC object
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:02:37 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.9i

Hi Bob,

* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 03:08:30AM CET:
> On Tue, 14 Feb 2006, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> 
> >OK to apply?  This patch turned up a couple of new entries in our TODO
> >list unfortunately.  :-/
> 
> Looks good to apply!

Applied.  Thanks!

Cheers,
Ralf

> >     * doc/libtool.texi (Implementation issues):  Note that both
> >     prefix and suffix of a library may differ.
> >     (Using libtool, Creating object files, Linking libraries):
> >     Remove last documentation traces of the age when `foo.lo' was
> >     the PIC object file and not the `libtool object' text file.
> >     (libtool script contents) <compiler_o_lo>: Remove description
> >     of this variable.  It was removed from libtool in 1.5 times.




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]