[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Results of test runs
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: Results of test runs |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:18:38 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.11 |
Hi Leif,
* Leif Ekblad wrote on Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 10:47:32AM CET:
> I enclose results on a test-run on libtool
This test has $host and $build i686-pc-linux-gnu, but we would like to
see how it fares on RDOS. So if RDOS is a cross-target, you would use
something similar to
configure --host=i686-rdos-whatever
(adjust to the appropriate value/your toolchain prefix) and possibly
specify some of them also manually (CC, LD, AR, ..)
and if you can build natively on RDOS, just do that, it's bound to be
simpler.
I'm not sure what your goal is; your recent question indicates that you
need the libtool changes in order to be able to create a GCC that
targets RDOS. Is that correct? Have you managed to either get them
to apply your libtool-related changes, and/or have you maybe managed
to just apply the yourself to a local GCC source tree and build from
that, including regeneration of the generated files. (Note I don't
know exactly how that works within the GCC source tree, but I guess
they have some documentation that explains how to do this?)
Cheers,
Ralf
- Re: Testing was: [PATCH] RDOS support for libtool, (continued)
- Re: Testing was: [PATCH] RDOS support for libtool, Leif Ekblad, 2006/01/13
- Re: FYI: [PATCH] RDOS support for libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/01/13
- Re: FYI: [PATCH] RDOS support for libtool, Leif Ekblad, 2006/01/13
- Re: FYI: [PATCH] RDOS support for libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/01/13
- Re: FYI: [PATCH] RDOS support for libtool, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/01/13
- Re: FYI: [PATCH] RDOS support for libtool, Leif Ekblad, 2006/01/13
- Re: FYI: [PATCH] RDOS support for libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/01/13
- Re: FYI: [PATCH] RDOS support for libtool, Leif Ekblad, 2006/01/13
- Results of test runs, Leif Ekblad, 2006/01/17
- Re: Results of test runs,
Ralf Wildenhues <=
- Re: Results of test runs, Leif Ekblad, 2006/01/17
- Re: Results of test runs, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/01/17
- Re: Results of test runs, Leif Ekblad, 2006/01/17
- Re: Results of test runs, Ralf Wildenhues, 2006/01/17
- Re: Results of test runs, Peter O'Gorman, 2006/01/17