Re: more bugs in branch-2-0/HEAD

[Ralf Wildenhues]

Hi Gary,

* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sat, Sep 17, 2005 at 03:14:12PM CEST:
> Summary:
> 
> I move to strike the lt_dlcaller_register api change from the list of
> release blockers.  From the list of known bugs altogether in fact.  Read
> on to find out why...

*snip nice explanation*
> If anything, as part of the move to a new interface, we should change
> all of the functions that iterate over all loaded modules too, so that
> developers don't accidentally start poking around with modules that
> were loaded by another library.

I may be convinced that we should not provide a backward-compatible
interface in this case.  But _then_, we should use a different name,
so that linking will fail hard with an undefined reference/symbol.  I
don't trust this in the compiler's hands only (as opposed to both the
link editor and the runtime linker).

Can we agree on a name change?  It probably needs a bump of CURRENT
(and setting AGE and REVISION to 0), and a simultaneous change of CVS
HEAD m4, I believe.  Any other sufferers?

Cheers,
Ralf