Re: Interix support for libtool

[Thorsten Glaser]

Todd Vierling dixit:

>I'm fine with this; same reasoning.  Thorsten, if you have time to test,
>please do; I'm about to go on a personal trip for a week and don't have time
>for more code testing until then.

Okay. I'm dancing on more than one wedding at the same time tho, and I
would have to reboot for it :( but I regularily test anyway.

>Supposedly, if Interix is further maintained in the future, the buggy PIC
>support in its gcc will be fixed.

Sounds good.

>I would presume it means "it's not handled currently"; the comment block
>above is not mine.

Like I said - I haven't even looked at it.

>It should go back to interix3*.  Interix 2.2 is a very different beast, is
>no longer maintained, and likely has lots of hidden gotchas for which the
>libtool diffs would break horribly.

I'm more thinking of interix4 which would be matched by interix*,
that's why.

bye,
//mirabile
-- 
I believe no one can invent an algorithm. One just happens to hit upon it
when God enlightens him. Or only God invents algorithms, we merely copy them.
If you don't believe in God, just consider God as Nature if you won't deny
existence.              -- Coywolf Qi Hunt