libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Solaris whole_archive update


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: Solaris whole_archive update
Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2005 18:30:00 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i

* Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 03:41:25PM CEST:
> 
> Ahh, I actually know how to fix the Fortran failures, I think:
> AC_LIBTOOL_POSTDEP_PREDEP is missing from AC_LIBTOOL_LANG_F77_CONFIG.
> What I don't know is whether this was done by accident or on purpose to
> fix some breakage on other systems (have not checked the archives yet).
> This patch should make them work (branch-1-5):
> 
> Index: libtool.m4
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/Attic/libtool.m4,v
> retrieving revision 1.314.2.85
> diff -u -r1.314.2.85 libtool.m4
> --- libtool.m4        23 Apr 2005 08:16:40 -0000      1.314.2.85
> +++ libtool.m4        23 Apr 2005 13:34:19 -0000
> @@ -3831,6 +3831,7 @@
>  _LT_AC_TAGVAR(GCC, $1)="$G77"
>  _LT_AC_TAGVAR(LD, $1)="$LD"
>  
> +AC_LIBTOOL_POSTDEP_PREDEP($1)
>  AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_COMPILER_PIC($1)
>  AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_CC_C_O($1)
>  AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_HARD_LINK_LOCKS($1)
> 

Interestingly, this has never been part of Libtool.  At the time F77
support was enabled, the corresponding code had not been factored out of
the C++ config yet.

Thinking again, I'm not so sure whether that really is the problem you
are seeing ATM.  Could you be bothered to re-run the Fortran tests with
VERBOSE=X?  (Better even, if HEAD Fortran tests expose this as well,
rerun them instead.)

Thanks,
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]