Re: fix order of -L flags added for libtool dep libs

[Peter O'Gorman]

Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 03:50:03PM CEST:
>
> > Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > | -           *) deplibs="$deplibs $path" ;;
> > | +           *) deplibs="$path $deplibs" ;;
> >
> > This is different to the patch for Zachary's bug which was:
> > - -             *) deplibs="$deplibs $depdepl" ;;
> > +             *) deplibs="$depdepl $deplibs" ;;
> | +             *" $depdepl "*) ;;
> | +             *) deplibs="$depdepl $deplibs" ;;

> The depdepl part is darwin-specific.  Tell me this is a non-issue and I
> will happily believe you.  :)

Looks like a non-issue.

I considered back-porting the change I made to HEAD to use darwin ld's 
-dylib_file flag to point to the indirectly referenced libraries (instead of 
the stable branch's behavior of just adding them to the link line), but 
thought that maybe it was too big a change for the stable branch. What do 
you think?

Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman - http://www.pogma.com