Re: osf5.1 + cc + -pthread

[Albert Chin]

On Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 04:54:51PM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> * Ralf Wildenhues wrote on Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 04:20:08PM CET:
> > * Peter O'Gorman wrote on Fri, Jan 14, 2005 at 02:52:47PM CET:
> > > 
> > > Can someone give a second opinion on this? Whose patch is "better"?
> > > I'm obviously biased, so shouldn't decide. Some kind of fix is required 
> > > though.
> > 
> > I'll give it a try.
> 
> Another thing I forgot (sorry):
> 
> Both of your patches do non-intuitive things.  Thus, both need more
> documentation as to what they do and why they do it.

Huh? libtool leaving off -pthread is non-intuitive.

-- 
albert chin (address@hidden)