libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: shell portability: don't use `set --'


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: shell portability: don't use `set --'
Date: Mon, 10 Jan 2005 12:05:21 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i

Hi Gary,

* Gary V. Vaughan wrote on Sun, Jan 09, 2005 at 06:01:01PM CET:
> Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> > How 'bout this?  Turned out to be a little work cleaning up the
> > remaining failures of the new test..
> > (Not so sure if I like the results better; bit of a quick hack).
*snip*
> >     * tests/sh.test: After `set dummy [...]', check for `shift'
> >     within the same and following line.
> >         * config/ltmain.m4sh (func_enable_tag, func_mode_install,
> >         func_mode_link): Sprinkle `shift's all over to confirm to this.
> 
> If there are no regressions, looks like a no-brainer to me.
> 
> Please commit!

Done (to HEAD and branch-2-0).

Could you please have a look at these proposed patches as well?

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2005-01/msg00024.html
(pending use of $as_cr_alnum -- I asked for this on the Autoconf list).

http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-12/msg00187.html
You might have reason to rather want this in lt_system.h, and since you
use this header in another project as well, I'd like you to make that
decision.

Thanks,
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]