[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool-1.5.10.ldsoinclude.patch
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: libtool-1.5.10.ldsoinclude.patch |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Nov 2004 08:26:40 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.4.1i |
* Daniel Reed wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 07:36:37PM CET:
> On 2004-11-17T09:13+0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> ) * Daniel Reed wrote on Wed, Nov 17, 2004 at 07:56:53AM CET:
> ) > I am told that /etc/ld.so.conf's format is considered an
> ) > implementation detail by glibc developers, and that no format will be
> ) > guaranteed. If Libtool is to continue parsing ld.so.conf, it will have
> ) > to be with the understanding that the file format can continue to be a
> ) > moving target.
I have still committed your patch -- it's an improvement over what we
had before (namely, bogus information in sys_lib_dlsearch_path_spec).
Let's discuss the general answer to this problem in light of your RFC on
libtool (might take some time though).
Regards,
Ralf