[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: MinGW cleanup patch
From: |
Peter Ekberg |
Subject: |
RE: MinGW cleanup patch |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Nov 2004 21:23:24 +0100 |
Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
>* Peter Ekberg wrote on Wed, Nov 03, 2004 at 11:50:14AM CET:
>>
>> The second hunk is perhaps a bit messy though, some other
>> solution might be better...
>
>Why does MinGW declare execv in a broken way? Can't they fix that?
I don't know. Sorry. I might muster some energy and ask them, but
I'm not sure I'm going to bother.
>Are you familiar with MinGW dynamic linking issues? I've been trying
Not really. Sorry...
>to understand why the mdemo stuff fails, but so far failed to see a way
>out (short of removing *_LTX_preloaded_symbols in favor of a function
>returning a pointer to local storage). See the thread at
>http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-10/msg00184.html
>Pointers to helpful relevant docs are greatly appreciated as well.
>
>What's quite annoying for me is that just a simple test takes forever,
>not even speaking of the whole testsuite.
Cheers,
Peter
- MinGW cleanup patch, Peter Ekberg, 2004/11/03
- RE: MinGW cleanup patch,
Peter Ekberg <=
- RE: MinGW cleanup patch, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/04
- Re: MinGW cleanup patch, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/05
- Re: MinGW cleanup patch, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/05
- Re: MinGW cleanup patch, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/05
- Re: MinGW cleanup patch, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/11/05
- Re: MinGW cleanup patch, Ralf Wildenhues, 2004/11/05