[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool--gary--1.0--patch-14
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: libtool--gary--1.0--patch-14 |
Date: |
Thu, 22 Apr 2004 18:27:28 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 08:35:22AM -0500, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> One new issue I would like to bring up is that the new libltdl source
> file names are not 14-character friendly. It seems to me that libltdl
> source file names should accommodate older Unix systems with
> 14-character limits. There is no reason not to do so.
Why should we care about such archaic systems. If libtool-1.6 supports
them, then fine. If not, cha!
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- Re: libtool--gary--1.0--patch-14, (continued)
- Re: libtool--gary--1.0--patch-14, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/04/22
- Re: libtool--gary--1.0--patch-14, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/04/22
- Re: libtool--gary--1.0--patch-14, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/04/22
- Re: libtool--gary--1.0--patch-14, Richard Dawe, 2004/04/22
- Re: libtool--gary--1.0--patch-14, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/04/23
- Re: libtool--gary--1.0--patch-14, Richard Dawe, 2004/04/23
- Re: libtool--gary--1.0--patch-14, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/04/23
- Re: libtool--gary--1.0--patch-14, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/04/23
- Re: libtool--gary--1.0--patch-14, Richard Dawe, 2004/04/24
- Re: libtool--gary--1.0--patch-14, Dalibor Topic, 2004/04/26
Re: libtool--gary--1.0--patch-14,
Albert Chin <=