[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl
From: |
Albert Chin |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl |
Date: |
Tue, 20 Apr 2004 07:16:05 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.6i |
On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 11:28:13AM +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> If POSIX dlopen are indeed thread safe, I think I will use them
> directly, instead of libltdl, without surrounding the calls with
> thread mutexes, and document that my package require POSIX/threadsafe
> dlopen. To check if the system have POSIX dlopen, I could check for
> the function itself, and that _POSIX_VERSION >= 200112L.
What about systems like HP-UX which don't have dlopen() (or require a
patch to get it)?
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, (continued)
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Simon Josefsson, 2004/04/15
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/04/15
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Simon Josefsson, 2004/04/15
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/04/15
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Simon Josefsson, 2004/04/15
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/04/15
- RE: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Howard Chu, 2004/04/15
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Gary V . Vaughan, 2004/04/19
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Alexandre Oliva, 2004/04/20
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Simon Josefsson, 2004/04/20
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl,
Albert Chin <=
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Simon Josefsson, 2004/04/20
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Alexandre Oliva, 2004/04/21
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/04/20
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/04/20
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Bob Friesenhahn, 2004/04/20
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Gary V. Vaughan, 2004/04/22
- Re: [RFC] pre-c89 in libltdl, Simon Josefsson, 2004/04/15