[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [FYI] loader-dyld.c did not compile
From: |
Gary V . Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: [FYI] loader-dyld.c did not compile |
Date: |
Mon, 19 Apr 2004 15:55:12 +0100 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 19 Apr 2004, at 14:48, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
Gary V.Vaughan wrote:
Yep, IIRC.
This got me to thinking that we should offer both under Panther (in
the same way you get
both LoadLibrary and dlopen under cygwin)... what do you think?
It would certainly make it easier to keep the dyld loader in a
compilable state :)
If you want to make it use both, that is fine with me, but I'd rather
that ltdl prefer dlopen if it is available.
Okay, I'll look into it presently.
Reason being that the dlopen in panther is better tested than the
dyld code in ltdl (although there are some striking similarities
between the two, `man 3 dlopen' on your panther box if you are curious
as to why).
Heh :-) Cool! Congratulations.
$ man 3 dlopen | grep Peter
If you find any more, please contact Peter O'Gorman
<address@hidden>
Cheers,
Gary.
- --
Gary V. Vaughan ())_. address@hidden,gnu.org}
Research Scientist ( '/ http://tkd.kicks-ass.net
GNU Hacker / )= http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool
Technical Author `(_~)_ http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFAg+hTFRMICSmD1gYRAnuJAJ9BCVKn/ReUE6t1nuGzFeOhD12xRwCbB0Xe
FAWgmMJ4cU/7Iao7YtLYiSk=
=rrbZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----