Re: Remove AC_LIBTOOL_TAGS -> do it as LT_INIT options

[Scott James Remnant]

On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 20:08, Albert Chin wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 01:55:08PM +0100, bonzini wrote:
> > I don't see much point in keeping AC_LIBTOOL_TAGS now that the beautiful 
> > LT_INIT patch is in.  It would be much better from a user point of view 
> > to have C++, Java, F77, RC options and have autoupdate include them all; 
> > then it would be immediate for the user to remove them.  In addition 
> > this gives us small configure script by default, while keeping backwards 
> > compatibility.
> 
> I thought we were going to LT_INIT([options],[tags])?
>   http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-01/msg00165.html
>   http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/libtool-patches/2004-02/msg00031.html
> 
We are getting something like this, I'm slightly swamped at the moment
(taking on new jobs and stuff) but it's right at the top of my TODO list
to finish up the documentation for the patch.

Scott
-- 
Have you ever, ever felt like this?
Had strange things happen?  Are you going round the twist?

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part