Re: [PATCH] remove dead code from AC_DEPLIBS_CHECK_METHOD

[Gary V. Vaughan]

Scott James Remnant wrote:
> A good rule of thumb is probably therefore if an arch goes for more than
> 6 months, or one significant release without getting the change to
> pass_all backed out again then the dead code can be removed.

> It changes no functionality, these architectures have been using
> pass_all for some time.

lt_cv_file_magic_test_file is only used when lt_cvs_deplibs_check_method is 
file_magic, so you can prune more aggressively.

I agree to remove the stuff that was already pass_all for libtool-1-5 if you
resubmit with the extra tidying.

Cheers,
        Gary.
--
  ())_.  Gary V. Vaughan    gary@(lilith.warpmail.net|gnu.org)
  ( '/   Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk       ,_())____
  / )=   GNU Hacker         http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool  \'      `&
`(_~)_   Tech' Author       http://sources.redhat.com/autobook   =`---d__/