[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: AIX patch for libtool.m4
From: |
Boehne, Robert |
Subject: |
RE: AIX patch for libtool.m4 |
Date: |
Fri, 30 May 2003 14:22:05 -0500 |
Albert,
This patch only effects SYSV libraries, which I have not found
any problems with. 1.5 & current CVS pass all 105 tests with xlC/xlc/xlf
when LDFLAGS=-Wl,-brtl and I haven't seen a report that suggests
that anything is broken. Without LDFLAGS=-Wl,-brtl -qmkshrobj is used
but AIX style library support isn't 100% complete. It seems to be
good enough that nobody has complained about the 5% left to do yet.
HTH,
Robert
-----Original Message-----
From: Albert Chin [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Friday, May 30, 2003 2:13 PM
To: address@hidden
Cc: jedwards
Subject: Re: AIX patch for libtool.m4
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 02:40:04PM -0500, Boehne, Robert wrote:
> Ok, that was interesting. Apparently Jim, you are correct, it is valid to
> add -qmkshrobj to a -G command line. However, I do not believe that
> Libtool should do this by default. If you want to add it yourself you can,
> Libtool allows this with -XCompiler -XLinker and -XCCLinker. If you still
> think this should be done by default, let us know why.
Wel, to get xlC C++ support for AIX, we're going to need -qmkshrobj.
I'm going to work on adding it this weekend. By default, -qmkshrobj
will export all symbols. We create our own export list for xlc C
shared libraries. Do we want to create our own export list for xlc C++
shared libraries as well?
--
albert chin (address@hidden)
_______________________________________________
Libtool-patches mailing list
address@hidden
http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool-patches
- AIX patch for libtool.m4, jedwards, 2003/05/27
- RE: AIX patch for libtool.m4,
Boehne, Robert <=
- RE: AIX patch for libtool.m4, Boehne, Robert, 2003/05/30
- RE: AIX patch for libtool.m4, Boehne, Robert, 2003/05/30
- RE: AIX patch for libtool.m4, Boehne, Robert, 2003/05/30