libtool-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposed patch for '-version-number' option for libtool


From: Robert Boehne
Subject: Re: Proposed patch for '-version-number' option for libtool
Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2003 10:32:28 -0600

Oops!  This patch will need to wait for a copyright assignment, so
pending that, it is approved.

Robert

Robert Boehne wrote:
> 
> With Albert's sugested change to the documentation, I'm checking
> this in to CVS head.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Robert
> 
> Albert Chin wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 19, 2003 at 05:22:48PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote:
> > >
> > > Around 18 o'clock on Feb 19, "Boehne, Robert" wrote:
> > >
> > > > 1st: new flags have to have documentation, as we discussed before it
> > > > should be made very clear what this flag is intended to be used for.
> > >
> > > See the attached ammended patch.
> >
> > operating systems.  New projects should use the @samp{-version-info} flag
> >                                             ^^^ addition
> >
> > --
> > albert chin (address@hidden)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Libtool-patches mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool-patches
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Libtool-patches mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/libtool-patches




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]