Re: patch for "g++-x.x" named compilers

[Albert Chin]

On Sun, Oct 27, 2002 at 10:43:54AM -0600, Robert Boehne wrote:
> Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> > 
> > On Thu, 24 Oct 2002, Robert Boehne wrote:
> > > <SNIP>
> > > Hmmm, what does this code actually do for us?
> > 
> > I wondered that myself.
> > 
> > > What would you all say to a patch that prints an
> > > error if the mode isn't specified?
> > 
> > That would be fine by me.
> > 
> > Bob
> > 
> 
> All right then, here it is.  This patch replaces the guessing
> of operation mode with an error message, and removes the variable
> default_mode as it is no longer used.
> 
> Ok to commit?

This means that people upgrading from 1.3.x or 1.4.x to 1.5.x will
have to retool how they invoke libtool. Do we really want to do this?

-- 
albert chin (address@hidden)