[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
FYI: 30-gary-trim-todo.patch
From: |
Gary V. Vaughan |
Subject: |
FYI: 30-gary-trim-todo.patch |
Date: |
Sat, 16 Mar 2002 18:51:31 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
Also applied to HEAD release.
Index: ChangeLog
from Gary V. Vaughan <address@hidden>
* TODO: Removed obsolete comments about RMS' package system.
Index: TODO
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/TODO,v
retrieving revision 1.46.2.1
diff -u -p -u -r1.46.2.1 TODO
--- TODO 3 Sep 2001 01:48:29 -0000 1.46.2.1
+++ TODO 16 Mar 2002 18:49:48 -0000
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ In the near future:
* Fix the following bugs in libltdl:
- Report dlerror() for dlclose and dlsym if available
- Make sure that the dependency_libs of a dlpreopened module won't be loaded.
-
+
* Check whether the version of libtool.m4 is compatible with
ltconfig/ltmain.sh. Meanwhile, the recommended approach for
developers using automake is to insert libtool.m4 in acinclude.m4.
@@ -55,8 +55,8 @@ respective ltdl.m4 macros.
* Godmar Back writes:
libltdl uses such stdio functions as fopen, fgets, feof, fclose, and others.
- These functions are not async-signal-safe. While this does not make
- libltdl unusable, it restricts its usefulness and puts an
+ These functions are not async-signal-safe. While this does not make
+ libltdl unusable, it restricts its usefulness and puts an
unnecessary burden on the user.
As a remedy, I'd recommend to replace those functions with functions
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@ respective ltdl.m4 macros.
out from which you can steal the latter.
I believe relying on async-signal-safe functions to the greatest extent
- possible would greatly improve libltdl's ability to be embedded in and
+ possible would greatly improve libltdl's ability to be embedded in and
used by other systems.
* Arrange that EXEEXT suffixes are stripped from wrapper script names
@@ -145,13 +145,6 @@ properly with AC_CONFIG_AUX_DIR using pr
Things to think about:
**********************
-
-* Talk with RMS about his so-called `automatic package generation
-tool.' This is probably what Thomas has been murmuring about for the
-Hurd. We'll need to integrate package-supplied programs such as
-libtool into that scheme, since it manages some of the preinstall and
-postinstall commands, but isn't installed itself. Probably, things
-like libtool should be distributed as part of such a binary package.
* Maybe implement full support for other orthogonal library types
(libhello_g, libhello_p, 64 vs 32-bit ABI's, etc). Make these types
--
())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk ,_())____
/ )= GNU Hacker http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool \' `&
`(_~)_ Tech' Author http://sources.redhat.com/autobook =`---d__/
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- FYI: 30-gary-trim-todo.patch,
Gary V. Vaughan <=