Re: test && test --> test -a

[Brad]

One reason which IMO is important, consistency.

// Brad

address@hidden
address@hidden

>Jens:
>
>Ok, I looked for the wrong string in ltmain.in (my bad!).
>My personal standards for portability are, "if it's used in ltmain.in,
>then it's OK" or "an authorative figure has assured me this is
>more portable" or "this isn't portable - here's the error I get on...".
>So, since test -a is currently used in ltmain.in, then it's ok until
>somone tells me otherwise.
>
>I don't understand why you want to change this, either way, -a or &&
>both are portable, both work exactly the same way (AFAICT).
>If you have some specific reason to go one way or the other, let us
>know, otherwise what's the point?
>
>Robert