Re: Don't discard -lgcc from `-lgcc -c -lgcc'

[Gary V . Vaughan]

On Monday 09 April 2001  7:27 pm, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> I've finally figured out why our duplicate-elimination is not as
> outrageous as I had thought at first.  Marking libraries as
> specialdeplibs is indeed a neat heuristics; see the comments in the
> patch below.

Oh yes.  I see what you mean!  Cool =)O|

> Unfortunately, it doesn't catch the common case of the
> libraries implicitly linked in by GCC, which affects our ability to
> create correct C++ shared libraries with g++.

I don't see how removing some duplicated libraries will change the ability of 
libtool to link g++ libraries.  Sure we have some problems with implicit libs 
when linking using ld, but I thought this problem was addressed by MLB?

> Fixed as follows.  Ok to install?

Great!  Please go right ahead =)O|
-- 
  ___              _   ___   __              _         mailto: address@hidden
 / __|__ _ _ ___ _| | / / | / /_ _ _  _ __ _| |_  __ _ ___       address@hidden
| (_ / _` | '_|// / |/ /| |/ / _` | || / _` | ' \/ _` | _ \
 \___\__,_|_|\_, /|___(_)___/\__,_|\_,_\__, |_||_\__,_|//_/
home page:  /___/                      /___/                  gpg public key:
http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk           http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk/key.asc