Re: More info on libldtl failure

[Nick Hudson]

"Gary V. Vaughan" wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 08:06:49AM -0800, Nick Hudson wrote:
> >
> > I don't understand what the benefit of following the deplib-chain is? I
> > guess its to support some missing functionality in some platforms. If so why
> > can't this be enabled/disabled at configure/build time?
> 
> Good point, I'm working on it.  Please sent me configuration triplets
> for hosts which you know will autoload deplibs without any help from
> libltdl.

OK I've now tested the changes with my KDE2 packages. Everything is
working and has speeded up massively.

Nick
ps. I believe all the BSD derivatives should work.

-- 
aka address@hidden, address@hidden

Index: ltdl.m4
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/libtool/libtool/ltdl.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.17
diff -c -r1.17 ltdl.m4
*** ltdl.m4     2001/02/02 19:02:38     1.17
--- ltdl.m4     2001/02/04 13:13:28
***************
*** 76,81 ****
--- 76,84 ----
        linux*)
          libltdl_cv_sys_dlopen_deplibs=yes
          ;;
+       netbsd*)
+         libltdl_cv_sys_dlopen_deplibs=yes
+         ;;
        solaris*)
          libltdl_cv_sys_dlopen_deplibs=yes
          ;;