[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: More info on libldtl failure

From: Nick Hudson
Subject: Re: More info on libldtl failure
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 22:28:53 -0800 (PST)

On Tue, 30 Jan 2001 23:19:27 +0000, Gary V. Vaughan wrote:

>  Hi Bob,
>  Hmmm.  I think I can see why this might be... the entire deplib chain
>  is followed and loaded for each lt_dlopen()ed module.  Perhaps I need
>  to cache previous successes and failures to avoid repetition?  Or
>  maybe I just need to provide an option to ignore deplibs (and emulate
>  the old behaviour that served us so well before)?


I believe your analysis is correct. This libltdl "feature" is causing a slow
behaviour for my KDE2 packages for NetBSD. I've been playing with the idea
that the deplibs should be ignored as well as they should be "auto" loaded
by the OS

aka address@hidden, address@hidden

 Get 100% private, FREE email for life from Excite UK

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]