[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lt_dlhandle list iterator

From: Alexandre Oliva
Subject: Re: lt_dlhandle list iterator
Date: 07 Jan 2001 01:26:30 -0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands)

On Jan  5, 2001, "Gary V. Vaughan" <address@hidden> wrote:

> Currently, with lt_dlforeach, there is no way to implement search
> algorithms across the opaque list of loaded modules.  This patch
> defines a new function, lt_dlhandle_next(), modelled on lt_dlinfo_next.

In this case, shouldn't there be a function to obtain the first
dlhandle too?

IIRC, the point of not having iterators like that was that we might
eventually go for a different implementation of dlhandle sets that
wouldn't be easily mapped onto an iterator type.  But I really don't
see a reason to use anything different from a linked list, which is
quite suitable for sequential iteration, so this is ok with me.

Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see
Red Hat GCC Developer                  address@hidden,}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        address@hidden,}
Free Software Evangelist    *Please* write to mailing lists, not to me

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]