|
From: | Mark Holmquist |
Subject: | Re: [libreplanet-discuss] [fossil-users] [OT] Who's interested in project management & collaboration tools? And... |
Date: | Tue, 07 Aug 2012 15:14:32 -0700 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120615 Thunderbird/13.0.1 |
Of course, maybe I've misunderstood the purpose of this list. If so, I invite dissent!Freedom is not necessarily incompatible with charging a fee for access to a distribution service that happens to contain specific GPLed content, assuming that's what Miles meant by "limited release."
No, the model is thus: Pay $X for the software after release Pay $X+2Y for the software during beta Pay $X+3Y for the software during alpha Pay $X+4Y for the source code after release Pay $X+5Y for the source code during beta Pay $X+6Y for the source code during alphaMy problem is that he's releasing the software to people, but not giving them the source code, or the ability to change it (in fact, since he's clearly not using the GPL for these releases, the source code could still be under restrictive licenses). Stopping that behavior is exactly why we're on this list.
-- Mark Holmquist Contractor, Wikimedia Foundation mtraceur@member.fsf.org http://marktraceur.info
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |