[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Alternatives to closed, non-free webmail servi
From: |
Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak |
Subject: |
Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Alternatives to closed, non-free webmail services? |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jul 2012 14:41:33 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.5-0.slh.1-aptosid-amd64; KDE/4.8.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Dnia środa, 25 lipca 2012 o 14:32:49 Ziv Leyes napisał(a):
> People tend to "trust" big corporates, as silly as this may sound,
> of course...
I know, but that's a different problem.
> They will tend to trust big organized monsters to keep their data
> safe, instead of trusting a home user like you and me, that could
> be potentially a hacker
Lulz. ;)
Seriously, though, that's a problem of appearances and public
perception, and Facebook + Microsoft are doing some great groundwork
for us there lately.
> But in any case, most users are not so concerned about the
> "freedom" we're looking for, so this alternative to those services
> should be a better choice, otherwise, we can just keep using the
> existing services. But I like the idea, and I think it's doable,
> again, not without a little hassle, someone needs to manage it,
True.
> some server needs to control and coordinate the communications.
False. Look at BitTorrent and magnet links. Look at Tor.
> That's why I think we don't need to reinvent the wheel, services
> like sneer or friendica are already using this same principle so
> why make yet another one if we already have one that's doing it
> fine?
Nowhere have I said we need to create a new service. If there are
services that implement this idea, great, let's test them, use them,
develop them and promote them.
--
Pozdrawiam
Michał "rysiek" Woźniak
Fundacja Wolnego i Otwartego Oprogramowania
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Alternatives to closed, non-free webmail services?, (continued)
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Alternatives to closed, non-free webmail services?, Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak, 2012/07/24
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Alternatives to closed, non-free webmail services?, Robert Martinez, 2012/07/24
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Alternatives to closed, non-free webmail services?, Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak, 2012/07/24
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Alternatives to closed, non-free webmail services?, Joel Kahn, 2012/07/24
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Alternatives to closed, non-free webmail services?, Ramana Kumar, 2012/07/29
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Alternatives to closed, non-free webmail services?, Mark Holmquist, 2012/07/29
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Alternatives to closed, non-free webmail services?, Felipe T. R. Tovar, 2012/07/24
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Alternatives to closed, non-free webmail services?, Ziv Leyes, 2012/07/25
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Alternatives to closed, non-free webmail services?, Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak, 2012/07/25
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Alternatives to closed, non-free webmail services?, Ziv Leyes, 2012/07/25
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Alternatives to closed, non-free webmail services?,
Michał 'rysiek' Woźniak <=
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Alternatives to closed, non-free webmail services?, Felipe T. R. Tovar, 2012/07/25
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Alternatives to closed, non-free webmail services?, Bryan Baldwin, 2012/07/25
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Alternatives to closed, non-free webmail services?, Patrick Anderson, 2012/07/25
- Re: [libreplanet-discuss] Alternatives to closed, non-free webmail services?, Bryan Baldwin, 2012/07/25