libmicrohttpd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libmicrohttpd] Remove plibc?


From: Evgeny Grin
Subject: Re: [libmicrohttpd] Remove plibc?
Date: Sat, 25 Jan 2014 14:55:56 +0400

Thanks LRN for used functions list. Very useful analysis!

Christian, "wrapper" don't require code duplication so list is not so scaring.
MHD actually needs:
_SetErrnoFromWinError - very simple long "switch", code can be redesigned to 
live without it.
_win_strerror - one more long "switch", same as _SetErrnoFromWinError
_win_socketpair - used instead of pipe, can be implemented as MHD_socketpair or 
MHD_pipe. As side effect, MHD_USE_SOKET_INSTEAD_OF_PIPE can be added to MHD 
(may be useful outside win32 platform)
_win_mmap and _win_munmap - used only in memorypool.c and for MHD needs can be 
implemented in much simpler way than full-featured implementation in PlibC.

As side effect this can improve performance of MHD.

Evgeny


25.01.2014, 13:03, "Christian Grothoff" <address@hidden>:
> That still feels like it would be too much code to duplicate.
>
> My 2 cents
>
> Christian
>
> On 01/25/14 08:55, LRN wrote:
>>
>>  _SetErrnoFromWinError - utility
>>  _win_accept - wrapper
>>  _win_bind - wrapper
>>  _win_close - dispatcher/wrapper
>>  _win_listen - wrapper
>>  _win_mmap - implementation
>>  _win_munmap - implementation
>>  _win_recv - wrapper
>>  _win_select - implementation (reducible)
>>  _win_send - wrapper
>>  _win_setsockopt - wrapper
>>  _win_shutdown - wrapper
>>  _win_socket - wrapper
>>  _win_socketpair - implementation
>>  _win_strerror - implementation
>>  _win_tdelete - implementation (unneded)
>>  _win_tfind - implementation (unneded)
>>  _win_tsearch - implementation (unneded)
>>  _win_write - wrapper
>>  plibc_init - utility
>>  plibc_shutdown - utility
>>
>>  "wrapper" means that it calls some other function, although it may add
>>  some error conversion from Windows errors to errno.
>>
>>  "implementation" means actual code and/or more than one lowlevel
>>  function call.
>>
>>  "utility" is there to support plibc itself



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]