[libextractor] Re: libextractor Digest, Vol 4, Issue 1

[Ravi Desai]

Hi,
   Sorry for the late reply.
   Thanks for your suggestion, using the subversion source worked
without any problems. I'm going to be asking my distro's package
maintainer to include this in the distro.
   Thanks for all your help,
ravster.

Christian Grothoff <address@hidden> wrote:

> It works here without the static glib using --disable-glib.  I suspect that
> patching the 0.5.2 release with the makefile that I sent to the mailinglist
> somehow failed on your machine.  Can you try to compile the code from
> subversion?  Just install svn and the autotools, and then run this:
>
> $ svn checkout https://gnunet.org/svn/Extractor
> $ cd Extractor
> $ . bootstrap
> $ ./configure --disable-glib --prefix=/tmp
> $ make
> $ make install
>
> This should really work.  If not, please pipe the output of configure+make
> into a file and send it to me!
>
> Thanks!
>
> Christian
>
> On Wednesday 20 July 2005 07:13 pm, Ravi Desai wrote:
>
>
> > Hi
> >    Thanks for the reply. On your suggestion, I tried the
> > '--disable-glib' flag. I also tried the '--enable-static' flag, but
> > neither of the two worked.
> >    The error message remains the same though.
> > Thanks,
> > ravster
> >
> > Christian Grothoff wrote:
> >
> >
> > > I think you have two choices.
> > >
> > > Either compile relocatable (for non-Intel archs) static versions of glib
> > > and gtk yourself, or use "--disable-glib" which should disable
> > > compilation of the plugins that depend on the static glib version and
> > > thus solve the problem at the expense of a few features.
> > >
> > > Christian

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature