libcvd-members
[
Top
][
All Lists
]
Advanced
[
Date Prev
][
Date Next
][
Thread Prev
][
Thread Next
][
Date Index
][
Thread Index
]
[libcvd-members] CMake vs autotools
From
:
Georg Klein
Subject
:
[libcvd-members] CMake vs autotools
Date
:
Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:46:32 +0100 (BST)
Would anyone object massively if I add cmake scripts to TooN/CVD/gvars?
It's an alternative to autotools, and is (IMO) much better. I think the
two should be able to coexist.
reply via email to
[Prev in Thread]
Current Thread
[
Next in Thread
]
[libcvd-members] CMake vs autotools
,
Georg Klein
<=
Re: [libcvd-members] CMake vs autotools
,
Edward Rosten
,
2008/07/14
Prev by Date:
Re: [libcvd-members] libcvd cvd/Linux/dvbuffer3.h cvd_src/Linux/dvbu...
Next by Date:
Re: [libcvd-members] libcvd cvd/Linux/dvbuffer3.h cvd_src/Linux/dvbu...
Previous by thread:
[libcvd-members] libcvd cvd/Linux/dvbuffer3.h cvd_src/Linux/dvbu...
Next by thread:
Re: [libcvd-members] CMake vs autotools
Index(es):
Date
Thread