[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [libcvd-members] GUI/GVars readline code

From: Gerhard Reitmayr
Subject: Re: [libcvd-members] GUI/GVars readline code
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2008 11:13:25 +0000
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20070801)

I'm fine about the gl part, more interested in the text rendering. I
have been using fltk2 fine, but switched to CVD::glwindow alone to avoid
the dependency on fltk2. now I only have it through gvars3. I'd be happy
to just make CVD::glwindow work on different platforms. If X is ok, then
Unix and OSX already work fine. A windows or Carbon implementation
shouldn't be too hard.

If some simple, independent text rendering could be had (or someone can
design a nice line font, mine are dreadful :). I looked at various nice
gl wrappers of freetype but it just adds lots of dependencies...

a pure gl GUI implementation could be added to gvars3 (replacing the
current toolkit bindings) or just used by myself...

Georg Klein wrote:
> The only vaguely reliable cross-platform way to do this is GLUT, or
> FLTK, which emulates GLUT. At the moment I'm using GLUT, since it's
> bundled with OSX; but I'm rapidly realising that it is in fact THE
> DEVIL, and may switch to FLTK soon.
> Even FLTK makes you jump through very hacky hoops to get it to let you
> render when you want to, but it does get you an OpenGL context on all
> three major OS.
> If limited bitmap fonts aren't for you, there's only really freetype,
>  and the million or so libraries which wrap around it. Alternatively,
> make your own bitmap texture.
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Gerhard Reitmayr wrote:
>> quite reasonable. I started a pure gl-based implementation not using any
>> toolkit besides the CVD::glwindow class, because I have an on screen
>> display (similar to Georg) for the mobile setups anyway. I am just not
>> happy with my current text rendering solution, using my own line fonts.
>> What are your solutions to rendering text in gl  (or without gl for that
>> matter)?
>> Gerhard
>> Edward Rosten wrote:
>>> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008, Georg Klein wrote:
>>>> Would anyone be terribly upset if I had a go at changing the GUI
>>>> libreadline call? IMO the current model is bizarre, and the whole
>>>> thing could be replaced by a singleton which handles interactive
>>>> console input, using libreadline if it's available and std::getline if
>>>> it's not.
>>>> This is partially motivated by the fact that libreadline is GPL, so
>>>> having it optional is a good thing if gvars is supposed to be LGPL!
>>> Go ahead. By the way, GVars currently compiles two versions, one with
>>> readline and one without. has _no_ interactive
>>> components at all.
>>> Also, does it make sense to anyone else to allow multiple toolkits.
>>> Shouldn't there just bt a GUI_Widgets (which is essentially GUI_Fltk,
>>> GUI_Fltk2 or GUI_Motif), where the specific toolkit is selected at
>>> library build time?
>>> I think this may be my fault, by the way...
>>> -Ed
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> libcvd-members mailing list
>>> address@hidden
>> -- 
>> Gerhard Reitmayr
>> MIL, Engineering Department, Cambridge University
>> tel: +44 1223 765150
>> _______________________________________________
>> libcvd-members mailing list
>> address@hidden

Gerhard Reitmayr
MIL, Engineering Department, Cambridge University
tel: +44 1223 765150

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]