[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD
From: |
Edd Barrett |
Subject: |
Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD |
Date: |
Sun, 9 Dec 2018 16:10:32 +0000 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.11.1 (2018-12-01) |
On Sat, Dec 08, 2018 at 04:53:24PM +0100, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> But i would really be surprised if it worked with the intermediate state
> where this was already in place:
>
> > 11: 09:41:34 043459 audio false no 0 no
> > 170: 09:41:34 043459 leadout (97 MB raw, 97 MB formatted)
>
> lead-out should start after track 11, not at the same address.
> What do you get from this run ?
Well spotted. I'd missed this.
To clarify, before the fix I posted in my previous email:
---8<---
CD-ROM Track List (7 - 5)
#: MSF LSN Type Green? Copy? Channels Premphasis?
7: 00:02:00 000000 audio false no 0 no
8: 03:07:72 013947 audio false no 0 no
9: 05:46:12 025812 audio false no 0 no
10: 07:24:74 033224 audio false no 0 no
11: 09:41:34 043459 audio false no 0 no
170: 09:41:34 043459 leadout (97 MB raw, 97 MB formatted)
--->8---
And after:
---8<---
CD-ROM Track List (7 - 5)
#: MSF LSN Type Green? Copy? Channels Premphasis?
7: 00:02:00 000000 audio false no 0 no
8: 03:07:72 013947 audio false no 0 no
9: 05:46:12 025812 audio false no 0 no
10: 07:24:74 033224 audio false no 0 no
11: 09:41:34 043459 audio false no 0 no
170: 12:48:10 057460 leadout (128 MB raw, 128 MB formatted)
--->8---
So the leadout is correct. But the following issue you pointed out does indeed
still persist:
> > CD-ROM Track List (7 - 5)
>
> Shouldn't that be "(7 - 11)" ?
> I see in libcdio/src/cd-info.c :
>
> printf("CD-ROM Track List (%i - %i)\n" NORMAL,
> i_first_track, i_tracks);
>
> where "i_tracks" probably should be "i_first_track + i_tracks - 1".
>
> Do you agree ?
I do! Again, well spotted!
https://github.com/vext01/libcdio/commit/561d7a8ed195e29a16cf87236c568531c1871031
---8<---
CD-ROM Track List (7 - 11)
#: MSF LSN Type Green? Copy? Channels Premphasis?
7: 00:02:00 000000 audio false no 0 no
8: 03:07:72 013947 audio false no 0 no
9: 05:46:12 025812 audio false no 0 no
10: 07:24:74 033224 audio false no 0 no
11: 09:41:34 043459 audio false no 0 no
170: 12:48:10 057460 leadout (128 MB raw, 128 MB formatted)
--->8---
--
Best Regards
Edd Barrett
http://www.theunixzoo.co.uk
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/01
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/01
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Rocky Bernstein, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Rocky Bernstein, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/02
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/03
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/08
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/08
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD,
Edd Barrett <=
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/09
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/09
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/09
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/09
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/09
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/09
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Edd Barrett, 2018/12/10
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/10
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Thomas Schmitt, 2018/12/11
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD_MSF_FORMAT vs LBA on NetBSD, Rocky Bernstein, 2018/12/11