Re: [Libcdio-devel] [RFC] Alternative proposals: pragmatic-multiextent ts-multiextent

[Pete Batard]

Hi Thomas,

On 2018.07.14 11:42, Thomas Schmitt wrote:
> i have (for now) completed the branches
>
>    ts-multiextent
>
>    pragmatic-multiextent

Great!

> Pete, may i ask you to test pragmatic-multiextent in your programs
> and with your ISO collection ?

For varied reasons, it may be a couple of weeks before I can modify my 
application to try to use the pragmatic-multiextent API. But I'll try to 
do that when I get a chance.

I can however indicate that, while pragmatic-multiextent compiles fine 
with MinGW-w32 on Windows, the test suite fails for testisorr.exe with 
the following testisorr.log.

-- Good! Did not find Rock Ridge in D:/libcdio/test/data/copying.iso
-- Should have found Rock Ridge for D:/libcdio/test/data/copying-rr.iso
FAIL testisorr.exe (exit status: 2)

Same also appears to occur for me when testing on Linux...

I haven't tested the latest ts-multiextent. I may do that for MinGW, but 
only if this is the branch that's going to be merged into mainline (a 
move that, if it needs to be reminded, I would vote firmly against).

Regards,

/Pete