[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation
From: |
Rocky Bernstein |
Subject: |
Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation |
Date: |
Sun, 5 Feb 2012 14:00:15 -0500 |
On Sun, Feb 5, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Thomas Schmitt <address@hidden> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > http://jbum.com/cdg_revealed.html
>
> Very interesting. (Very very pre-MMC, too.)
>
> The graphics protocol reminds me of my first self-implemented pixel
> graphics
> on a VIC-20.
> It has nothing to do with CD-TEXT, except that it has to fit into the
> same kind of 24 x 6 bit packets. It would be suitable to fill a few MB.
> So its use in the program area makes sense.
>
> Consider to fork a node "CD+G" from "CD Text". Both are only related
> by the fact that they use the subchannels R to W for storing data.
>
Also, they are both extensions to the Red Book that I don't have much to
say about other than to draw attention to the fact that there are these
extensions. That is why they are lumped together.
>
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> Looking at the commit diff of cd-text.texi:
>
> Here you altered the technical statement:
>
> Pack type @kbd{0x87} (Genre Identification) contains 2 binary bytes,
> -followed by 0-terminated text. The two bytes constitute a 16-bit
> -Big-endian number are decoded as follows:
> +followed by an ASCII NUL. For category associated with Big-endian 16-bit
> +value is given see @ref{table:categories}.
> The NUL comes after the text which describes a sub-genre. You removed the
> mentioning of this text.
> (The sentence "For category ..." looks somehwat ill, too.)
>
Ok. Changed.
>
> -----
>
> -Pack type @kbd{0x89} is yet quite unclear. It might be a representation
> +Pack type @kbd{0x89} (Second Table of Contents) not yet clear.
>
> The verb "is" seems to be missing.
>
Ok. Changed.
>
> -----
>
> -Pack type @kbd{0x89} is yet quite unclear. Especially what the
> +It is not unclear what Pack type @kbd{0x89} is used for, and what the
>
> "not" is surplus and deceiving.
>
"not" removed. "not's can tie one in knots".
>
> -----
>
>
> Have a nice day :)
>
> Thomas
>
>
>
- [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Thomas Schmitt, 2012/02/04
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Rocky Bernstein, 2012/02/04
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Thomas Schmitt, 2012/02/04
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Leon Merten Lohse, 2012/02/04
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Thomas Schmitt, 2012/02/04
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Rocky Bernstein, 2012/02/04
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Thomas Schmitt, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Rocky Bernstein, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Thomas Schmitt, 2012/02/05
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation,
Rocky Bernstein <=
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Thomas Schmitt, 2012/02/06
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Rocky Bernstein, 2012/02/06
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Thomas Schmitt, 2012/02/06
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Rocky Bernstein, 2012/02/06
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Thomas Schmitt, 2012/02/06
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Rocky Bernstein, 2012/02/07
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Thomas Schmitt, 2012/02/08
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Rocky Bernstein, 2012/02/08
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Thomas Schmitt, 2012/02/08
- Re: [Libcdio-devel] CD-TEXT documentation, Rocky Bernstein, 2012/02/08